2026
OurTop10 Research · The Pressure Corridors · Vol 1

Building where the strain is

Australia is approving too few homes to meet the National Housing Accord, and the homes it does approve are landing in the council areas where mortgage strain is climbing fastest.

Media contact, key numbers, quotes and state-by-state figures →

Current reading: Year to June 2026
Next update: Quarterly
Sources: ABS Building Approvals · Digital Finance Analytics
34,751Homes short of the Accord pace over the year to June 2026
17.8%Rise in strained mortgage households in the postcodes covered, same year
76%Of homes approved in the most strained councils were detached houses, against 64% in comparable councils

The reading

Australia approved 205,249 dwellings in the twelve months to June 2026. The Accord target implies 240,000 a year. That is a shortfall of 34,751 homes. One in every seven homes that should have been approved was not. Every month of the year came in under the required pace.

Over the same twelve months, the number of mortgage-holding households modelled as under financial strain across the postcodes in this analysis rose 17.8 per cent.

Set approvals and strain side by side by council and the same names turn up on both lists: Logan and Ipswich outside Brisbane, Casey, Hume and Whittlesea on Melbourne’s fringe, Wanneroo north of Perth, Camden and Campbelltown in south-west Sydney, Playford north of Adelaide. These are the council areas with land to build on, and they are also the ones the modelling flags hardest.

The full series

Dwellings approved each month against the Accord pace, Australia, original terms.

Month Total approved Houses Dwellings
excl. houses
Accord pace Gap
July 2025 18,256 10,757 7,499 20,000 −1,744
August 2025 15,378 9,730 5,648 20,000 −4,622
September 2025 18,612 10,194 8,418 20,000 −1,388
October 2025 17,569 10,747 6,822 20,000 −2,431
November 2025 18,575 9,965 8,610 20,000 −1,425
December 2025 15,163 8,864 6,299 20,000 −4,837
January 2026 10,685 7,065 3,620 20,000 −9,315
February 2026 19,229 10,409 8,820 20,000 −771
March 2026 18,120 11,200 6,920 20,000 −1,880
April 2026 17,653 10,465 7,188 20,000 −2,347
May 2026 17,046 11,202 5,844 20,000 −2,954
June 2026 18,963 11,218 7,745 20,000 −1,037
Twelve months 205,249 121,816 83,433 240,000 −34,751

Source: OurTop10 Pressure Corridors, powered by Digital Finance Analytics · ourtop10.com.au/reports/pressure-corridors/

Original terms, not seasonally adjusted. That is the only basis on which small-area data is published. January’s figure reflects the usual summer shutdown rather than a collapse in demand.

The corridors are building houses, not apartments

In the council areas where more than half of mortgage holders are modelled as strained, 76 per cent of approvals over the year were detached houses: 35,453 houses against 11,104 other dwellings. In the lower-strain councils in the same dataset it was 64 per cent.

Individual corridors run far higher again: Wanneroo 94 per cent, Playford 89, Hume 87, Casey 84. Brisbane City is the exception in that group at 31 per cent. It sits outside the comparison above because it is a capital-city council rather than a growth corridor.

The supply being added is detached housing on the urban fringe, in the corridors where households are already stretched, rather than density closer to jobs. Both sides of that comparison come from the same ABS count, so it does not rely on the modelling.

Where strain rose fastest, and what was approved there

Twelve-month change in strained mortgage households by council, alongside dwellings approved in the same year.

Rutherford
Cessnock council
+106%767 homes approved
Kingston (Tas.)
Kingborough council
+97%145 homes approved
Mount Pleasant (Mackay – Qld)
Mackay council
+47%604 homes approved
Armadale (WA)
Armadale council
+45%1,648 homes approved
Launceston
2 of 3 postcodes
+42%219 homes approved
Logan
2 of 14 postcodes
+42%5,035 homes approved
Hallett Cove
Marion council
+39%874 homes approved
Palmerston
2 of 5 postcodes
+34%248 homes approved

Where the strain data covers a single postcode, the suburb is named rather than the council.

Logan. Strained households rose 42 per cent in a year, and 5,035 homes were approved in the same period. That is the second-largest approval count of any council here.

Camden. Two of its three postcodes are covered here, so the approvals and the strain describe close to the same ground: 21,352 households with a home loan, 19,547 modelled as strained, 1,759 homes approved.

Council by council

Every council where both datasets exist. The coverage column shows how much of each council the strain data actually describes; rows shaded where it covers 40 per cent or more of the council’s postcodes.

Council Market Homes approved
yr to Jun 2026
Postcodes
covered
Mortgaged
households
Under
strain
Strain
rate
Strain
12 mths
Brisbane Brisbane 9,237 11 of 85
13%
40,084 22,134 55% +7%
Logan Brisbane 5,035 2 of 14
14%
15,369 10,693 70% +42%
Wyndham Melbourne 4,046 2 of 5
40%
45,903 9,276 20% -7%
Canberra ACT 4,031 13 of 29
45%
67,549 17,529 26% +19%
Wanneroo Perth 4,017 2 of 18
11%
25,607 22,749 89% +16%
Ipswich Brisbane 3,522 2 of 7
29%
22,132 14,866 67% +12%
Casey Melbourne 3,516 4 of 10
40%
54,016 29,659 55% +18%
Hume Melbourne 3,053 1 of 13
8%
23,294 11,875 51% +22%
Whittlesea Melbourne 2,783 1 of 9
11%
11,580 7,130 62% +2%
The Hills Shire Sydney 2,696 2 of 4
50%
24,547 9,485 39% +9%
Swan Perth 2,478 3 of 9
33%
21,211 8,291 39% +17%
Blacktown Sydney 2,415 1 of 23
4%
6,498 6,498 100% +9%
Playford Adelaide 2,241 1 of 6
17%
7,444 5,211 70% +18%
Liverpool Sydney 2,163 1 of 9
11%
7,176 7,002 98% +16%
Camden Sydney 1,759 2 of 3
67%
21,352 19,547 92% +20%
Campbelltown (NSW) Sydney 1,691 1 of 7
14%
12,946 12,946 100% +9%
Armadale Perth 1,648 1 of 4
25%
16,981 7,170 42% +45%
Toowoomba Brisbane 1,541 2 of 16
12%
22,546 18,817 83% +24%
Stirling Perth 1,514 2 of 21
10%
14,657 12,199 83% +7%
Cockburn Perth 1,381 2 of 6
33%
25,639 7,197 28% +19%
Ballarat Melbourne 1,374 1 of 6
17%
10,575 9,547 90% +9%
Cardinia Melbourne 1,294 2 of 15
13%
21,904 10,491 48% +12%
Onkaparinga Adelaide 1,285 3 of 16
19%
19,897 7,395 37% +5%
Port Adelaide Enfield Adelaide 1,144 2 of 15
13%
5,464 3,975 73% +24%
Fairfield Sydney 1,064 1 of 9
11%
15,151 14,705 97% +13%
Salisbury Adelaide 1,030 2 of 9
22%
11,698 11,001 94% +19%
Marion Adelaide 874 2 of 10
20%
9,075 4,312 48% +39%
Frankston Melbourne 786 1 of 7
14%
9,903 7,818 79% +22%
Cessnock Sydney 767 1 of 4
25%
7,182 6,783 94% +106%
Serpentine-Jarrahdale Perth 761 1 of 6
17%
5,853 4,943 84% +30%
Mount Barker Adelaide 669 1 of 5
20%
3,996 3,208 80% +8%
Brimbank Melbourne 656 1 of 11
9%
9,684 8,665 89% +19%
Mackay Brisbane 604 1 of 12
8%
14,447 8,139 56% +47%
Tea Tree Gully Adelaide 543 2 of 13
15%
6,037 3,597 60% +18%
Canning Perth 426 2 of 6
33%
17,547 5,028 29% +13%
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Sydney 383 1 of 2
50%
8,804 6,603 75% +23%
Clarence Hobart 292 1 of 13
8%
1,996 1,517 76% +24%
Palmerston NT 248 2 of 5
40%
6,618 3,134 47% +34%
Launceston Hobart 219 2 of 3
67%
4,610 3,712 81% +42%
Barossa Adelaide 208 1 of 2
50%
4,047 3,373 83% new to rankings
Glenorchy Hobart 207 3 of 3
100%
7,477 6,163 82% +3%
Darwin NT 171 4 of 9
44%
10,540 3,010 29% +27%
Kingborough Hobart 145 1 of 7
14%
2,426 2,123 88% +97%
Sorell Hobart 135 1 of 5
20%
1,693 1,693 100% +26%
Bunbury Perth 132 1 of 3
33%
7,901 5,805 73% +5%
Litchfield NT 119 2 of 8
25%
2,392 923 39% +30%
Huon Valley Hobart 90 1 of 5
20%
1,886 1,451 77% +7%
Cabonne Sydney 32 1 of 5
20%
7,733 6,587 85% +1%
Alice Springs NT 31 2 of 4
50%
3,726 2,707 73% -4%
Katherine NT 31 1 of 2
50%
832 832 100% +9%
Central Highlands (Tas.) Hobart 4 1 of 1
100%
2,211 2,211 100% +9%

Source: OurTop10 Pressure Corridors, powered by Digital Finance Analytics · ourtop10.com.au/reports/pressure-corridors/

Read the coverage column first. Approvals are counted for the whole council area. Strain is modelled only for the postcodes listed. Where coverage is low, as in Brisbane at 13 per cent and Blacktown at 4 per cent, the strain figure describes a handful of suburbs inside a much larger council and should be read that way. It is not a council-wide strain rate.

What the numbers say

The shortfall and the strain point at the same policy problem. The Accord’s answer to housing pressure is supply. Supply ran 34,751 homes behind the required pace over the year, and what did get approved concentrated in growth corridors where strain is climbing. Building more is necessary. Where it lands is a separate question.

The overlap is not a cause. We are not claiming that building causes strain, or that strained councils build faster. Tested directly, the relationship between a council’s strain rate and how fast it builds is flat. What the data shows is that Australia’s growth corridors are carrying both at once.

Strain is moving quickly in specific places. Cessnock more than doubled its strained households in twelve months. Kingborough rose 98 per cent, Mackay 47, Armadale 45 and Logan 42. Four states, same direction.

These are not the same households. New estates are sold to new buyers, not to families already struggling a suburb away. What makes it relevant is that DFA’s largest strained group is recent first home buyers with small deposits, and that is who buys in a growth corridor.

Two western Sydney postcodes sit at the model’s ceiling. In Mount Druitt (2770, Blacktown council) and Campbelltown (2560), the modelled strained count equals the mortgage-holding count. A reading at the ceiling means the model has run out of room, not that every household in those councils is failing.

Approvals are the optimistic number. An approval is permission to build, not a finished home. Some lapse, some are never started, and the rest take years.

Definition and method

The OurTop10 Pressure Corridors sets ABS dwelling approvals by Local Government Area against Digital Finance Analytics modelled mortgage stress for the postcodes inside each council. Approvals are total dwelling units approved, all sectors, all work types, July 2025 to June 2026, in original terms. Strain rate is DFA’s stressed household count divided by mortgage-holding households in the same postcodes. That calculation is performed by OurTop10 and is not published by DFA.

The Accord comparison divides the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million homes over five years from July 2024 evenly across the period, giving 240,000 a year. It is a flat division and does not weight for population growth, state allocation or construction seasonality.

Stated limitations. DFA ranks the most affected postcodes in each market rather than every postcode, so coverage of each council ranges from 4 per cent to 100 per cent and is published in the table above; council figures are not council-wide strain rates. Small-area approvals are published only in original terms, so the annual total here will not match the seasonally adjusted monthly figures used in the OurTop10 Supply Gap, which measures the same shortfall on a seasonally adjusted basis. Monthly small-area approvals are volatile, which is why this index uses a full year.

Revisions. The ABS revises small-area approvals for up to two years. This page carries figures as published in the June 2026 release; revised figures are picked up at the next update and the change is noted.

For journalists

Status: exclusive preview, not published. Please confirm before use.

Contact: Mansour Soltani, Head of Research, OurTop10 · [email protected]
Available for interview, including talkback and on-camera. Martin North of Digital Finance Analytics can also comment on the modelling.

Data: the full 51-council table is available as a spreadsheet on request, including every figure on this page plus postcode-level detail.

Credit line: OurTop10 Pressure Corridors, September 2026, analysis of ABS Building Approvals and Digital Finance Analytics modelling. Link to ourtop10.com.au/reports/pressure-corridors/

The five numbers

  • 34,751. Homes Australia fell short of the National Housing Accord pace in the year to June 2026. One in every seven.
  • 12 of 12. Months in that year where approvals came in under the required pace.
  • 17.8%. Rise in mortgage-holding households under financial strain across the postcodes covered, over the same year. Every state and territory rose.
  • 76%. Share of approvals in the most strained council areas that were detached houses, against 64% in comparable councils.
  • 42% and 5,035. The rise in strained households in Logan, and the homes approved there, over the same twelve months.

Quotes, cleared for use

“The country is short 34,751 homes against its own target, and every month last year missed the pace. That is the run rate, not a blip.”

Mansour Soltani, Head of Research, OurTop10

“We are not saying that building homes causes mortgage stress. We tested that and the relationship is flat. What the data shows is that the supply we are managing to add is landing in the same growth corridors where households are already stretched, and it is overwhelmingly detached houses on the fringe rather than density near jobs.”

Mansour Soltani, Head of Research, OurTop10

“Logan is the one I would watch. Strained households there rose 42 per cent in a year while five thousand homes were approved. Those are different people in the same postcode, arriving at the same time.”

Mansour Soltani, Head of Research, OurTop10

Your state at a glance

Covers the councils in this analysis, not the whole state. Change is over the twelve months to June 2026.

Market Councils Homes approved Households under strain Strain, 12 mths Most approvals Highest strain rate
Sydney 9 12,970 90,156 +16.9% The Hills Shire (2,696) Blacktown (100%)
Melbourne 8 17,508 94,461 +12.9% Wyndham (4,046) Ballarat (90%)
Brisbane 5 19,939 74,649 +20.3% Brisbane (9,237) Toowoomba (83%)
Perth 8 12,357 73,382 +16.6% Wanneroo (4,017) Wanneroo (89%)
Adelaide 8 7,994 42,072 +27.5% Playford (2,241) Salisbury (94%)
Hobart 7 1,092 18,870 +20.8% Clarence (292) Sorell (100%)
ACT 1 4,031 17,529 +19.1% Canberra (4,031) Canberra (26%)
NT 5 600 10,606 +17.6% Palmerston (248) Katherine (100%)

Source: OurTop10 Pressure Corridors, powered by Digital Finance Analytics · ourtop10.com.au/reports/pressure-corridors/

What this report does not say

  • It does not say building homes causes mortgage stress. Tested directly, the relationship is flat.
  • It does not say the buyers of new homes are the households under strain. They are different people in the same communities.
  • It does not give council-wide strain rates. Each figure covers only the postcodes listed in the coverage column.
  • A strain reading at 100% means the model has reached its ceiling, not that every household in that area is failing.

Citing this index

Source: the OurTop10 Pressure Corridors, September 2026. OurTop10 analysis of ABS Building Approvals by Local Government Area and Digital Finance Analytics household modelling.
Please link to ourtop10.com.au/reports/pressure-corridors/

Companion index: the OurTop10 Supply Gap tracks the national shortfall month by month. Pressure Corridors asks where the building that does happen is landing.